Our Editorial Standards
The articles on our Journal cover topics that can shape decisions about your health and wellbeing. This page explains how we choose what to write, how we use AI tools, how we check facts, and what to do if you spot a mistake.
Last updated 4 October 2026
Five things we hold ourselves to
Evidence before opinion
We build articles on systematic reviews, clinical guidelines and peer-reviewed studies, and we link to them so you can read the source yourself.
Honest about limits
Many complementary therapies have limited or mixed research behind them. When that is the case, we say so plainly in the article.
No promises we cannot keep
We describe what an approach may help with or support. We never claim that a session will cure or guarantee an outcome.
Your safety first
Articles explain when to see a doctor or psychologist instead of, or before, a complementary approach.
Written for life in Dubai
We write for people living and working in the UAE, with local context where it genuinely matters.
How we use AI tools
Do you use AI to write articles?
Yes, but only as an assistant. Our editorial team uses AI writing tools to sketch outlines and produce rough first drafts. Every draft is then substantially rewritten by a person, in our own voice, before anyone reads it.
What does a person do?
A person picks the topic and the sources, rewrites the draft, and traces every fact, figure and citation back to where it came from. The same check applies to everything around the article that search engines and AI assistants read: the headline, the snippet shown in search results, the structured data and the descriptions on images. If we cannot confirm something, it comes out or is clearly qualified.
What is never left to AI?
Decisions about health claims, safety advice and when to refer someone to a doctor are made by people. We do not use AI to invent quotes, testimonials, reviews or client stories.
How can I tell how an article was made?
Each recent article ends with a short note explaining how it was produced and linking back to this page.
Who is behind the articles
Articles are written by the Miracles Wellness editorial team and published under the name of our founder, Amrit Chand Schmidt. Unless an article states that a named practitioner has reviewed it, it has not been individually reviewed by one, and it should be read as general information.
How we describe the evidence
We use plain language to show how strong the research is behind each claim.
| When we say | What it means |
|---|---|
| Strong evidence | Supported by systematic reviews or clinical guidelines. |
| Promising or emerging | Encouraging results from smaller or fewer studies that still need confirming. |
| Limited or mixed | Few good-quality studies, or results that disagree. Many people still find the approach helpful, but research cannot yet confirm it. |
| Traditional or experiential | Based on practice and client experience rather than research. |
Not medical advice. Our articles are general information and are not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a doctor or licensed therapist. In an emergency in the UAE, call 999 for police or 998 for an ambulance.
Updates and corrections
We review articles when new research or guidelines are published and show the date an article was last updated at the top of each page. If you think something is wrong or out of date, please contact us. We will check it against the sources and correct the article where needed.